Hiring Scorecard

Generate a Hiring Scorecard tailored to your inputs.

Share:XWhatsAppLinkedIn
You are an expert recruiter and hiring manager. Generate a structured interview scorecard for the following role.

Role: {{job_title}}
Department: {{department}}
Seniority: {{seniority}}
{{competencies_list}}
{{must_haves_list}}

Create a comprehensive hiring scorecard in Markdown format with:
1. A header with role details
2. A rating scale table (1–5) with clear labels and descriptions
3. 4–6 competency sections, each with:
   - Competency name and weight (High/Medium/Low)
   - A behavioral indicators table for each rating level (1–5)
   - A score field and notes field
4. A must-have checklist based on the role requirements
5. A scoring guide table mapping total scores to hire/no-hire recommendations
6. A final recommendation section with checkboxes

Be specific to the role. Use concrete, observable behavioral indicators.

Fill the 5 fields below to customize.

Customize before copy

Fill these — your prompt updates live.

Stays in your browser. Nothing sent anywhere — we don't run a server for this.

Using Gemini, Llama, Mistral or local LLMs? Copy the prompt and paste — no deep-link supported.

Sample

Example output

What the prompt produced when KLI ran it for a real case. Yours will vary by model and inputs.

# Hiring Scorecard: Software Engineer — Engineering (Senior)

## Overview
Use this scorecard to evaluate candidates consistently across all interviews. Rate each competency on a 1–5 scale after the interview.

---

## Rating Scale
| Score | Label | Description |
|-------|-------|-------------|
| 5 | Exceptional | Far exceeds expectations; rare top-tier signal |
| 4 | Strong | Meets and often exceeds expectations |
| 3 | Acceptable | Meets core expectations; some gaps |
| 2 | Weak | Below expectations; significant gaps |
| 1 | Poor | Does not meet expectations |

---

## Competencies

### 1. Technical Problem-Solving
**Weight:** High

| Rating | Indicators |
|--------|-----------|
| 5 | Breaks down complex problems elegantly; considers edge cases proactively |
| 4 | Solid approach; minor oversights quickly corrected |
| 3 | Can solve problems with some guidance |
| 2 | Struggles with decomposition; needs significant prompting |
| 1 | Unable to approach problem systematically |

**Score:** ___   **Notes:** _______________

---

### 2. Communication & Collaboration
**Weight:** Medium

| Rating | Indicators |
|--------|-----------|
| 5 | Extremely clear; adapts style to audience; proactively clarifies |
| 4 | Clear communicator; works well with others |
| 3 | Adequate communication; occasional clarity issues |
| 2 | Struggles to articulate ideas; misses collaboration cues |
| 1 | Poor communication; does not engage with team dynamics |

**Score:** ___   **Notes:** _______________

Or skip the copy-paste

Just use GigApply — it does this natively.

Auto-apply to remote Mercor gigs — curated daily, no email required. Built by the same KLI team that wrote this prompt.

Open GigApply
Related

You might also like

Made with KLI — extracted from real tools, shared free. krakelabsindia.com